The whole why vote article, tells me that voting is ultimately a matter of choice. Do you vote? yes or no? why or why not? do you know the issues? yes? or are you just voting blind? These are all the questions that most people come across and it's because of these questions that it'll come down to whether they'll vote or not. I honestly agree with the article on some of it's cases, on how without voting powers, or forced voting, people willl inevitably become controlled by the government.
PSA responses. The capital emphasis in a PUBLIC SERVICE announcement is to reach a target audience. And I believe the commerical that tried to reach the youngest age group failed in that department. Yes it's important to have a good commerical that catches people's attention. But it's also important to catch the right KIND of people. What's the point of drawing in <18 year olds, when they can't even VOTE? A good aspect about the commerical is that it knows what attracts a certain audience. For this particular commercial, it was based on what was deemed the "teenage norm" of this time. What would they most likely be doing other than watching t.v.? And I think that having commercials super attention catching, at the same time, able to be related to their audience group, is important
